TAJLR - Texas Association For Justice And Legal Reform

[blanfear]

Dealing with Criminal Law for the past year has really opened my eyes. How deep is the corruption? There is one thing I do not understand, and NEVER, EVER will I agree with it. It's called Defense Attorneys not burning their bridges with Prosecuting Attorney's! WHOA! Wait one minute here! We pay these guys royally to defend our innocent loved ones right? The first statements I heard where this, "Mrs. Lanfear innocent people get arrested everyday." (fine..I can understand that) "Mrs. Lanfear innocent people get convicted everday!" (I DID NOT understand that one) BUT! I do now! Oh yes, you better believe that there needs to be some MAJOR changes made! OK....call those two the opening statements. Get ready for the closing statements! Mrs. Lanfear your Family is not a victim here, nobody has done anything wrong."

OUCH!!!! I beg to differ! Facts: First off let me explain all charges where dropped against my son, thanks to two girls who help catch the real pervert! Not a Victim? #1. They took an innocent young man, aired his arrest and mug shot on TV, and newspapers in the College town of his dreams #2. He was evicted from his apartment (the humiliation of all this? He immediately moved back home with us) #3. After he moved 3 hours away there where still numerous reports of this crime still going on, same description of the suspect as how he was identified. He was identified strictly off his Drivers License Photo inwhich at the time he had weighed 225, he weighed 175-180 when he moved up there) yet it was publicly aired again that he did not fit the description of the current suspect?? Hey I am NOT STUPID!!! Eleven months this went on, thousands of dollars GONE! Here is the real gut grabber. His charges consisted of 6 counts of indecent exposure with numerous alligation, in the four short weeks he was there. Not only was all that aired, here is the sickening part. Using his name of course,"Lanfear would approach victims, flash them, start doing lewd acts" With the numerous alligations and the extent of these alligations, IF he would of been found guilty? You got it! One more innocent Victim of false alligations having to register as a sex-offender. Try dealing with that for almost a year, on top of being told, "In cases like this, the jury tends to lean towards the victims!!" Although we had massive, tons of evidence to prove his innocence, that one statement stuck deep in my head! How many times have we heard these cases on TV and jumped the gun, thinking this ass is guilty?? Right! Scary as hell huh! I will stand up for what is right! My Innocent Son DESERVES JUSTICE! So do millions of others!

Sincerely,
Beverly
_________________
Matthew 7:2 For you will be treated as you treat others. The standard you use in judging is the standard by which you will be judged

[Rob Sandifer]

Beverly,

Texas is a very conservative state. That is what must be remembered at all times. Being a conservative state, they do NOT want to raise taxes that would be necessary to levy in order to pay for proper legal representation for the poor and otherwise indigent. That is the way our judicial system is set up... it really makes a mockery out of the principles of justice that we were taught in elementary/middle/high school - that justice is blind and access to the courts is equal.

The sad reality is that justice is NOT blind and there is NO such thing as equal access to the courts. Just ask *anyone* on the Exclusion List...

Rob Sandifer
_________________
"Some men see things as they are and ask "why"? I dream of things that never were and ask "why not"?

- The late Senator Robert F. Kennedy

[dannoynted1]

I am bringing this letter with the hope and faith that finally justice will be done.
On November 1, 2001. In case #01-crf-211, I reported for docket call without my attorney at approximately 9am. My attorney informed me he would not be able to be with me. He was already scheduled to be in federal court. Mr. Jimenez assured me the court hearing was a formality and the previous case 00-crf-547 was moot.
After conferring with the judge for docket call. The judge informed me I was free to go. I needed to use the phone. I had no money and I asked Ms. Dayner Roberts? secretary if i could use hers. She said okay .I knew her but I do not remember her name. There was no answer. After using the phone I was leaving when Ms. Roberts prevented me from leaving the courthouse by physically intimidating me. She said I was not free but would be arrested if I did not (allow myself to) submit to her demands. I explained to her that she was mistaking the case #00-crf-547 for the case 01-crf-211 which is the case I was there not for the previous case. She refused to call my attorney or recognize the judges last statement that i was free to go.
I have heard her brag on numerous occasions that she was the judge?s boss and that no case was put on the docket unless she said so. She refused to let me be free to go and said that the judge didn?t know what he was doing when he told me i was free to go. I was appalled that she intended to force me to submit to authority, which was not legal. I told her that she was referring to another case but she said, ?Don?t you remember what the judge told you?? I said yes but that was another case and she said that its the same case just another case number. She took me to the pretrial supervision department where Yolanda Carmona adult supervision officer took physical custody but I again said, ?Where is the order?? Dayner Roberts and officer carmona after making me leave the courthouse with her physically threatening presence she was in my face to the point wher i felt i would have to run. I knew I was not wrong. i did not have my attorney available he was in CC and in federal court. Surely the judge was not wrong when he told me i was free to go.
But here i was being bullied and having to defend myself .i wanted to leave but i was not free to go. So Yolanda Carmona told me that the judge put you on pretrial and for you to come here and submit to a UA. You don?t remember? I said that was another case and to call my lawyer. She refused and i said where is the copy of the order? She said that she had it, she just can?t find it I said that?s because there isn?t one. She said that i didn?t do what i was told and i said that i would take one if all of them took one and they all in unison said we did we did already and i said no, take one right now. Carmona said that none of your business and i said THATS- right! its none of your business! don?t you want to get this straight?. I said, ?that was another case and the judge said i was free to go? and she said, ?That?s because he forgot?. She said lets go see and well clear everything up. So I allowed myself to be escorted even though I knew I there was no reason if i had not committed a violent crime or a drug related offense. The required bond conditions which the case i was being detained were being altered without my attorney present or the courts saying so. I was watching like it was a movie. I sat in the courtroom and i spotted a guy I knew to ask if i could borrow his phone to try and call my attorney and she pointed at me and said, ?you BETTER not leave. I assured her i was just stepping out to use the phone. I called my attorneys office and told them. I hung up and called my husband because it was a cell phone that reached cc and it was long distance from the courthouse. The imminent threat that I started to cry I had done nothing to provoke these women. After being told by .the judge that i was free to go i told her im leaving because the judge told me i was free to go she grabbed my arm hard and menacingly said you?re not going anywhere! I wanted to physically defend myself but my instincts knew i was being provoked to force me to give up. I said get your hands off of me and she said to Sam fugate and everyone else witnessing this act. She cried she won?t submit she won?t submit! Fugate arrived to the top step where his eyes got big and his mouth fell open and stopped at obviously taken aback. Right then Rick Martinez bailiff for the judge opened the door and told Carmona ?there is no warrant, we can?t hold her? i said ?bye? and I left.

That same day the state filed its motion to revoke bond and stated it had done so November 1,1999 in this cause 01-crf-211. i never received a copy until i was given access to my file from trial counsel. On November 5,2001 Trial counsel argued that he believed they were referring to another case. The fact that they were revoking my bond based on a previous hearing namely 00-crf-547 Adolph Hitler?s birthday of all days, April 20,2001. This is the day the pretrial supervision office alleges i left without permission. On November 1,2001 i had permission as Rick Martinez bailiff informed us. The hearing on April 20
2001 is when i asked to talk to the judge because the community supervision refused to honor the pretrial diversion agreement that john Kearney, county court appointed as counsel in cause 00-crf-547. At this hearing i submitted an incomplete letter that I was to hopeless to try. I repeated called my attorney and left numerous messages about the hearing and the treatment at the community service office. I never received a response. At the status hearing I was asked if I had counsel and I pointed out John Kearney who told the court that he was no longer represented me and no longer counsel because an agreement had been reached in this cause? well the court ?but he would be happy to represent me if the reappointed him.? The court said, ?lets just read the letter first and see if she needs one.? the rest should be a matter of public record. Since i have not been given the free copy of the reporter?s record i am unable to say with certainty what is or is not in the court record. Because I did not have an attorney at this hearing, which was crucial, my Pre Trial Diversion Agreement was revoked. I immediately sought counsel. Fred Jimenez counsel retained is still unpaid.

Out of the goodness of his heart and not his wallet Fred Jimenez agreed to represent me, called the court, and talked to John Hubert. He said ?John, I have Lee Ann Haley in my office and she just told me a wild story. Is she on any pre trial supervision or has she been indicted or is there a warrant issued for her?? He said no to all three according to Fred Jimenez. Mr. Jimenez said ?You know you?re messing with a District Judge? and I said I didn?t have an attorney, I said that the judge was wrong that I had not done anything wrong; that they took away the agreement that we just negotiated on March 29, 2001. I heard Fred ask to be notified if there were any changes concerning me and any case against me; So that I may appear and not be subjected to appearing without representation.

On august 23,2001, I received a traffic ticket by CCPD, applied as a substitute teacher for the Flour Bluff Independent School and attended a substitute orientation. I was approved and notified by the district to sub on Friday August 31, 2001 for the nurse. Then the day before I was to sub the district called me and cancelled.
Then i received a letter from F.B.I.S.D. Stating that I could not work for them because I had a questionable criminal background, I was sure they were mistaken.

On august 23, 2001 there was no criminal record but by August 30, 2001 there was according to FBISD. After a brief conversation concerning the reason for stating, I had a ?questionable criminal background.? They informed me a DPS record showed a pending charge. September 7,2001 i requested a copy of this dps document. On the way back from FBISD where I picked up the DPS info, I was pulled over by a city Marshall and arrested by the CCPD.



The trial began. In voir dire i heard the prosecutor refer to the crime on trial for. In phrases like? welfare fraud ?and ?selling food stamps for drugs on the street corner? that crime was not the charge.
I noticed the reactions by members of the voir dire jury. I noticed one specific member looking at me continuously with a smile that was not a happy smile. I told my attorney about this and i crossed her name out on the list. My attorney got mad at this but i made it clear that i did not want this person on my jury. Ironically, she was the foreman of the jury that convicted me. I pointed out to my counsel that she shared the name Lewis with a witness for the prosecution and that they could be related. She admitted they attended the same church, I wondered for how long?

At the end of the first day of trial, my husband informed Fred Jimenez trial counsel that he knew her and worked with her and reminded me that she was the teacher who had asked him to change the diaper of male student which he refused. He told counsel and me? her name is Marilyn Lewis.? He also stated he ? knew her son derrick ruff from laser school.?

The two jurors with same last name Hernandez also shared the same address.
1803 Louisiana refer to list of the jury. Ask if you do not have one.

I still have more to add but these are the halfway point call me so we can discuss this matter and complete the final draft.
Thank you,

LeeAnn Haley
[/b]

[Jaime Kenedeno]

Tampering with ........
6/10/2005 12:41 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a government document with intent to defraud & harm. A state jail felony 2 years in prison. I will tell you the details slowly. First, my family was on welfare. I took care of the kids while my wife earned her degree at A&I. Mary Cano the TWC Executive vice president worked directly with us. Then My wife graduated and started looking for a job. She used the TWC fax to send resumes and such. She interviewed for a job at EZ Pawn for the regional auditor. She was awarded the job and then they said they could not hire her because something came out of Austin that said they could not hire her. Austin is the EZ Pawn headquarters as well as the TWC. So I started Substitute teaching. Mary Cano sent me a outreach letter requiring me to attend an orientation. We called MRs Cano and told her that I was already working as a Substitute teacher. Mrs Cano insisted that I attend the orientation or she would be forced to penalize my family. She said, "Mrs Haley the Texas Workforce Does not recognize substitute teaching as employment." I argued with her to no avail. Then I clarified. I asked her if I was going to be penalized for being unemployed cuz substitute teaching is not considered employment then I should not need to count that income as income from employment, I reasoned that they could not be penalized for being unemployed while at the same time counting the income as money from employment. I worked one day in the first pay period. The net was $45. The taxes, social Security and Medicaid were deducted and I received ~$37. My wife made an entry in the application stating I had received "no money from work". This is what they prosecuted her for. We were becoming self sufficient as in the following months I began to work as did she. Then one day at lunch they came to my house and took her to jail. Much more to come. Ask if something is unclear
_________________
"Engaging the average citizen in the formulation of Public Policy" is our mission @ Kenedeno & Associates. "The Net is a powerful force for change "Those who live in Glass Houses should never throw rocks"!

[Jaime Kenedeno]

John Hubert maliciously prosecuted my wife (and others) for ascension and recognition.

Hubert is very intelligent and needed not to act in this manner but he had the Power and he abused it. Why the masses should care??????
It might be you next time!

The TWC is an umbrella for a vast array of scam programs claiming to help the poor while the elite of the private sector are influenced to participate and kickback to the local executive directors or one of theirs!
_________________
"Engaging the average citizen in the formulation of Public Policy" is our mission @ Kenedeno & Associates. "The Net is a powerful force for change "Those who live in Glass Houses should never throw rocks"!